Your shopping cart is empty
The Great Debate - Trusts vs Companies
Published on 06 Mar 2003 | Took place at City West Function Centre, Perth, WA
Which is the most tax efficient entity - a Trust or a Company?
This debate involved each team and team member advocating why their entity is the more tax efficient, followed by the necessary rebuttal.
Key issues debated included:
- tax rates
- tax concessions
- entry and exit strategies
- flexibility
- tax reform impacts
- compliance costs and obligations.
Advocates highlighted the key factors to be considered when choosing to trade through either a trust or a company, highlighting those that make each entity more efficient than the other.
Get a 20% discount when you buy all the items from this event.
Individual sessions
Walter Tieleman's case for trusts
Author(s):
Walter J TIELEMAN
Walter Tieleman debates the case for Trusts.
Materials from this session:
insert_drive_file
Brett Davies' case for trusts
Author(s):
Brett DAVIES
Brett Davies debates the case for trusts.
Materials from this session:
insert_drive_file
Roger Sullivan's case for companies
Author(s):
Roger SULLIVAN
Roger Sullivan argues in favour of companies.
Materials from this session:
insert_drive_file
Advantages of a Company Structure
Author(s):
Richard NORTON
Richard Norton argues in favour of companies.
Materials from this session:
insert_drive_file