Inconsistent treatment is hard to justify

Member Price: $35.00
Non Member Price: $45.00

shopping_cart Add to cart

DisclaimerThis material is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

Published on 01 Feb 02 by "THE TAX SPECIALIST" JOURNAL ARTICLE

A paper discussing the different treatment of tips and gratuities under the GST and the income tax.

Author profile

Dale Boccabella CTA

Dale has 18 years experience teaching a wide range of Australian taxation law courses at both undergraduate and postgraduate level including goods and services tax, fringe benefits tax, taxation of companies, tax administration and tax avoidance. Dale is currently teaching at the University of New South Wales and has also published over 70 articles on a wide range of areas of Australia’s taxation system. - Current at 29 May 2019

More by Dale BOCCABELLA

Australia’s denial of depreciation deductions for second-hand assets used in residential rental properties: rationales appear obscure - 01-July-2022
Franked distributions of trusts: systematic method of allocating them and other taxable income, with analysis of defective provisions - 01-October-2021
Myer isolated transactions doctrine (first strand) at 33-year anniversary - 01-August-2020
The age of the home worker – Part 2: Calculation of home occupancy expense deductions, deduction apportionment and partial loss of CGT main residence exemption - 01-April-2019
The age of the home worker – Part 1: Deductibility of home occupancy expenses - 01-December-2018
Recording entitlement rule in trust streaming provisions allows for creation of mismatches - 01-April-2016
Pattern of distributions test for discretionary trusts: Defects reveal questionable policy design and implementation - 01-August-2015
Defective pattern of distributions test guarantees revenue loss usage - 01-October-2014
Extinguishment of tax attributes (eg losses) on death under Australia’s income tax is anomalous and inequitable - 01-September-2013
Managing losses - Traps for the unwary paper - 18-May-2010
Tax practice: Ralph Report: retaining a work in progress advantage under the Ralph Report - 01-May-2000
Cash flow/tax value method: platform for accruals taxation indelibly planted - 01-March-2000
FCT v Rowe: will the High court overrule itself - 01-April-1996

Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Dale BOCCABELLA.

Copyright Statement

The Tax Institute
(ABN 45 008 392 372 (PRV14016))

("TTI")

The Tax Institute is a Recognised Tax Agent Association (RTAA) under the Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009.

Copyright Statement

All materials provided on this site are protected by copyright and are owned by or licensed to TTI.

Except as expressly permitted by TTI or the copyright owner, any person or company who uses this site must not use, reproduce, redistribute, retransmit, publish or otherwise transfer, or commercially exploit, the materials or any information, software or other content, in whole or in part, which is available through this site.

click to expand/collapse

The Tax Institute is Australia's leading professional association and educator in tax providing the best resources, professional development and networks.

Inconsistent treatment is hard to justify

Author profile

Dale Boccabella CTA

More by Dale BOCCABELLA

Copyright Statement

Copyright Statement

Explore

Membership

Social