shopping_cart

Your shopping cart is empty

Questions & answers: No GST payable on forfeited deposits: what are taxpayers’ rights to refunds?

Member Price: $22.00
Non Member Price: $28.00

DisclaimerThis material is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

Published on 01 Aug 07 by "TAXATION IN AUSTRALIA" JOURNAL ARTICLE

Stephen Jones and Ross Hocking of Maddocks consider the implications of the Full Federal Court’s decision in Reliance Carpet Co Pty Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2007] FCAFC 99.

Author profiles

Stephen Jones CTA
Stephen is a Special Counsel in Maddocks' Tax Disputes Team. - Current at 01 February 2008
Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Stephen JONES.
Ross Hocking CTA
Ross is a Special Counsel at KPMG Legal. With over 20 years experience as a lawyer, he specialises in tax controversy, advising and representing SMEs, large corporates and high wealth individuals with respect to tax risk, reviews, audits, objections, access powers, alternative dispute resolution and litigation. Ross practises in all areas of Commonwealth taxes. He has also represented the Commissioner in Part IVC and related litigation in the AAT, Federal Court, Family Court and Supreme Courts. - Current at 09 July 2015
Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Ross HOCKING.

 

Copyright Statement