shopping_cart

Your shopping cart is empty

Alternative assets insights: FCT v BHP Billiton Ltd: an influential decision

Member Price: $22.00
Non Member Price: $28.00

DisclaimerThis material is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

Published on 01 Apr 19 by "TAXATION IN AUSTRALIA" JOURNAL ARTICLE

FCT v BHP Billiton Ltd is the fi rst case to consider the defi nition of “associate”. Given the term’s widespread use, a detailed analysis is warranted.

Author profile

Stuart Landsberg
Stuart Landsberg is an international tax partner with over 19 years of experience advising clients on a range of issues relating to their cross-border investments and holdings. He has recently returned to Australia after a five year assignment to PwC US, where he led PwC's Australian Tax Desk and where he counselled US and Australian taxpayers in respect of their investments in the respective countries. Notwithstanding his specialisation in international tax, Stuart has a broad-based practice with a deep specialisation in the taxation of M&A and assisting clients to favourably resolve tax controversies too. He has a similarly broad-based industry focus, starting his career with a focus on energy and resources, but more recently advising clients in the technology sector and also advising financial sponsors and alternative asset managers in relation to their investments across the economy. - Current at 03 June 2025
Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Stuart Landsberg.

 

Copyright Statement