shopping_cart

Your shopping cart is empty

Split central management and control and dual residency

Member Price: $22.00
Non Member Price: $28.00

DisclaimerThis material is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

Published on 01 Jul 20 by "TAXATION IN AUSTRALIA" JOURNAL ARTICLE

The ATO’s approach to central management and control (CMAC) in TR 2018/5 and PCG 2018/9 introduces a new controversy into corporate residency by potentially treating a single board meeting as the exercise of CMAC in multiple jurisdictions. This article argues that such an approach is inconsistent with the foundation of CMAC first set out in De Beers case, and followed in previous dual CMAC decisions such as the Union Corporation case, that a company resides where CMAC actually abides and the real business of the company is carried on.

Author profile

Gordon Thring
Gordon is a Partner in the Corporate Tax practice of Deloitte. He has over 20 years experience in mining and energy, financial services and property sectors. He was extensively involved in the consultation arrangements regarding the introduction of Division 125 and the amendments to s45B to accommodate demerger relief. - Current at 19 March 2009
Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Gordon THRING.

 

Copyright Statement