shopping_cart

Your shopping cart is empty

President's report: Evasion – Who should bear the “burden of proof”?

Taxation in Australia | 1 Aug 12
 
Member Price: Free
Non Member Price: Free
file_download Download

DisclaimerThis material is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

Published on 01 Aug 12 by "TAXATION IN AUSTRALIA" JOURNAL ARTICLE

When it comes to tax evasion, there is a growing trend to conduct audits spanning many years. Ken Schurgott this month looks at who should be responsible for proving that assessments beyond the four-year period are correct or incorrect.

Author profile

Kenneth Schurgott CTA-Life
Ken is a Solicitor and Director of Schurgott & Co Lawyers specialising in taxation matters (including State Taxes, stamp duty, payroll tax and land tax) and with extensive experience in business structuring, business sales and acquisitions, asset protection, succession planning and trust and estate law. Ken is very experienced in tax dispute matters, negotiations for settlements, mediations and conciliations and litigation. He regularly appears before the AAT and NCAT and instructs counsel in matters before the Courts. Ken was National President of the Institute in 2012. - Current at 06 July 2022
Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Ken SCHURGOTT.

 

Copyright Statement