shopping_cart

Your shopping cart is empty

Trust distributions after Bamford

Taxation in Australia | 1 Sep 09
 
Member Price: $22.00
Non Member Price: $28.00

DisclaimerThis material is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from The Tax Institute.
Unless expressly stated, opinions are not that of The Tax Institute, which accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the information contained within it.

Published on 01 Sep 09 by "TAXATION IN AUSTRALIA" JOURNAL ARTICLE

In the recent decision of Bamford V FCT, the Full Court of the Federal Court has sought to resolve two of the most contentious issues which arise in relation to the taxation of trust income; namely, the meaning of the word “share” and the meaning of the words “income for the trust estate” in s 97 ITAA36. In this article, the author considers the practical implications for taxpayers of the Full Court’s decision.

Author profile

Kenneth Schurgott CTA-Life
Ken is a Solicitor and Director of Schurgott & Co Lawyers specialising in taxation matters (including State Taxes, stamp duty, payroll tax and land tax) and with extensive experience in business structuring, business sales and acquisitions, asset protection, succession planning and trust and estate law. Ken is very experienced in tax dispute matters, negotiations for settlements, mediations and conciliations and litigation. He regularly appears before the AAT and NCAT and instructs counsel in matters before the Courts. Ken was National President of the Institute in 2012. - Current at 06 July 2022
Click here to expand/collapse more articles by Ken SCHURGOTT.

 

Copyright Statement